LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Dug Road

1578.7 m · net rise 189.7 m · total ascent 190.2 m · overall 12.0% · evidence quality U (needs confirmation) · Campbell · New York ·

Shape: sustained — 37% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 380 m.

Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the state road inventory, OpenStreetMap and the point-cloud evidence for a graded road bed, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.

needs review max5 over 45, max10 over 40 — treat short-window maxima here as provisional.

≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 58% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈48%338–340 munder overhead cover
3 m (diagnostic)≈46%338–341 munder overhead cover
5 m≈45%338–343 munder overhead cover
10 m≈43%337–347 munder overhead cover
20 m≈40.0%331–351 munder overhead cover
25 m≈36.3%328–353 munder overhead cover
50 m≈26.4%328–378 munder overhead cover
100 m≈22.8%1428–1528 munder overhead cover

Measured on the mapped road line; moving the line 1 m either way reads 36.0–36.4% over 25 m.

may continue beyond end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Surface: mixed (80% unpaved), according to each state's road inventory: .

Access: Listed 2026-09-11 (record-class scrutiny, Peter): this page's steepest 25 m meets or exceeds the Baldwin Street mark (34.8 %). A figure that would beat the recognised records is treated with special scepticism: it stays out of the rankings until a person has passed it on the aerial, the road authority's line and the detector battery, as Ffordd Pen Llech and one Welsh lane were.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap · aerial imagery USGS (public domain)

Dug Road LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The map, profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Dug Road elevation profile
Dug Road rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

ElevationUSGS 3DEP (The National Map) — USGS 3DEP 1 m DEM, NY_FEMAR2_Central_2018_D19 (collected 2018)
Resolution / CRS1.0 m grid, EPSG:26918; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
Tilesx32y468
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)
Quality statusevidence quality U; review flags: max5 over 45, max10 over 40
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run ny-run3-260906, calculated 2026-09-06

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:26918",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/usa/ny/USGS_1M_18_x32y468_NY_FEMAR2_Central_2018_D19.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-06T13:05:51+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/new-york-2026-09-06-batch-band1.osm.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "",
  "run_id": "ny-run3-260906",
  "elevation_provider": "USGS 3DEP (The National Map)",
  "elevation_licence": "Public domain \u2014 USGS 3DEP 1 m DEM, courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey",
  "elevation_dataset": "USGS 3DEP 1 m DEM, NY_FEMAR2_Central_2018_D19 (collected 2018)",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "x32y468"
  ],
  "climb_origin": "discovered",
  "canopy_source": {
    "kind": "ept_corridor_max_return",
    "ept_source": "https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/NY_FEMAR2_Central_5_2018",
    "ept_crs": "EPSG:3857",
    "station_coverage": 1.0,
    "cell_ground_m": 1.0,
    "nodes_failed": 0
  },
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}