LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Discovered lane (43.4530, -72.9270)

1196.9 m · net rise 84.0 m · total ascent 90.9 m · overall 7.0% · evidence quality B (good) · Wallingford · Vermont ·

Shape: sustained — 43% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 67 m.

Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the state road inventory, OpenStreetMap and the point-cloud evidence for a graded road bed, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈37%730–732 munder overhead cover terrain reads 44.8% at 779–781 m across a structure — excluded
3 m (diagnostic)≈35%730–733 munder overhead cover terrain reads 43.5% at 779–782 m across a structure — excluded
5 m≈31%729–734 munder overhead cover terrain reads 41.4% at 779–784 m across a structure — excluded
10 m≈23%725–735 munder overhead cover terrain reads 37.8% at 774–784 m across a structure — excluded
20 m≈19.2%235–255 munder overhead cover terrain reads 28.9% at 770–790 m across a structure — excluded
25 m≈17.1%235–260 munder overhead cover terrain reads 26.2% at 765–790 m across a structure — excluded
50 m≈13.8%943–993 munder overhead cover terrain reads 19.8% at 759–809 m across a structure — excluded
100 m≈12.1%814–914 munder overhead cover terrain reads 15.8% at 710–810 m across a structure — excluded

may start earlierdescends at end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Surface: each state's road inventory records no surface for this road; the map may tell you more.

Access: Listed 2026-09-12 (texture re-measure): with the step masked the steepest 25 m reads 17.1 %, below the ranking door — kept as a listed page.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap · aerial imagery USGS (public domain)

Discovered lane (43.4530, -72.9270) LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The map, profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Discovered lane (43.4530, -72.9270) elevation profile
Discovered lane (43.4530, -72.9270) rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

ElevationUSGS 3DEP (The National Map) — USGS 3DEP 1 m DEM, VT_Statewide_A23 (collected 2023)
Resolution / CRS1.0 m grid, EPSG:26918; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
Tilesx66y482
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract), snapshot 2026-08-21T20:21:11Z
Quality statusevidence quality B; caveated windows: texture excluded
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run texture-us-vt-260911, calculated 2026-09-12

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:26918",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/usa/vt/USGS_1M_18_x66y482_VT_Statewide_A23.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-12T00:21:33+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/vermont-260821.osm.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "2026-08-21T20:21:11Z",
  "run_id": "texture-us-vt-260911",
  "elevation_provider": "USGS 3DEP (The National Map)",
  "elevation_licence": "Public domain \u2014 USGS 3DEP 1 m DEM, courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey",
  "elevation_dataset": "USGS 3DEP 1 m DEM, VT_Statewide_A23 (collected 2023)",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "x66y482"
  ],
  "climb_origin": "discovered",
  "canopy_check": "unavailable \u2014 EPT corridor failed: VT_Statewide_2_A23: no EPT nodes intersect the corridor; VT_Statewide_1_A23: no EPT nodes intersect the corridor",
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}