Roeburndale Road
1720.5 m · net rise 109.3 m · total ascent 149.6 m · overall 6.4% · evidence quality B (good) · Salter Clough · Lancashire · share
Shape: sustained — 39% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 129 m.
Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the OS road network, surface models and map tags, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.
Gradient ladder what do windows mean?
| Window | Maximum | Located at | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 m (diagnostic) | ≈27% | 124–126 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 85.3% at 14–16 m across a structure — excluded |
| 3 m (diagnostic) | ≈26% | 124–127 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 74.0% at 14–17 m across a structure — excluded |
| 5 m | ≈25% | 123–128 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 48.0% at 13–18 m across a structure — excluded |
| 10 m | ≈23% | 117–127 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 26.8% at 13–23 m across a structure — excluded |
| 20 m | 22.4% | 107–127 m | |
| 25 m | 21.7% | 106–131 m | |
| 50 m | 21.2% | 1267–1317 m | |
| 100 m | 18.5% | 1234–1334 m |
may continue beyond end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.
Map
Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap
No aerial layer here: Britain has no open or government source of aerial photography at road scale — the pan-government APGB imagery is licensed to the public sector only, unlike the LiDAR this survey is measured from. Street View, where it exists, is the visual check.
This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.
Access: Re-lined 2026-09-15 to the OS Open Roads network where the measured line had left the road: the steepest 25 m now reads 21.75 % (was 26.37 %) and sits 0.0 m from the mapped centreline. Ranked on the re-measured line.
Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.
Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed · Share this climb
Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%
© OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap
Profile
The map, profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).
Measurement card
| Elevation | Environment Agency — EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022) |
|---|---|
| Resolution / CRS | 1.0 m grid, EPSG:27700; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation |
| Tiles | E358000_N462000_2000m.tif, E360000_N462000_2000m.tif |
| Road centreline | OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract), snapshot 2026-08-26T20:22:15Z |
| Quality status | evidence quality B; caveated windows: structure excluded |
| Analysis | OCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run reline-campaign-260915, calculated 2026-09-15 |
Provenance
{
"analysis_version": "0.1.0",
"sample_interval_m": 1.0,
"interpolation": "bilinear",
"smoothing": "none",
"gradient_windows_m": [
5.0,
10.0,
20.0,
25.0,
50.0,
100.0
],
"diagnostic_windows_m": [
2.0,
3.0
],
"elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
"elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
"elevation_tiles": [
"data/cache/england/dtm_1m/E358000_N462000_2000m.tif",
"data/cache/england/dtm_1m/E360000_N462000_2000m.tif"
],
"calculated_at": "2026-09-15T06:40:40+00:00",
"road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
"road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
"osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/england-2026-08-27.osm.pbf",
"osm_snapshot": "2026-08-26T20:22:15Z",
"run_id": "reline-campaign-260915",
"elevation_provider": "Environment Agency",
"elevation_dataset": "EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)",
"elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Environment Agency",
"elevation_coverage_id": "13787b9a-26a4-4775-8523-806d13af58fc__Lidar_Composite_Elevation_DTM_1m",
"elevation_tile_ids": [
"E358000_N462000_2000m.tif",
"E360000_N462000_2000m.tif"
],
"climb_origin": "discovered",
"structure_own_ways": "none \u2014 the route carried no way list; own decks unmasked",
"structure_mask_ranges_m": [
[
0.0,
21.3
],
[
0.0,
17.1
]
],
"license": "ODbL-1.0",
"license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}