LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Plains Lane

442.4 m · net rise 47.2 m · total ascent 52.2 m · overall 10.7% · evidence quality B (good) · Marsden ·

Shape: sustained — 42% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 216 m.

Not yet matched against documented climbs — the measurement stands on its own.

≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 7% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈25%220–222 munder overhead cover terrain reads 81.8% at 25–27 m across a structure — excluded
3 m (diagnostic)≈25%239–242 munder overhead cover terrain reads 80.3% at 25–28 m across a structure — excluded
5 m≈24%237–242 munder overhead cover terrain reads 75.5% at 24–29 m across a structure — excluded
10 m≈23%235–245 munder overhead cover terrain reads 61.1% at 19–29 m across a structure — excluded
20 m≈22.8%225–245 munder overhead cover terrain reads 38.3% at 17–37 m across a structure — excluded
25 m≈22.8%220–245 munder overhead cover terrain reads 32.2% at 17–42 m across a structure — excluded
50 m21.9%195–245 m
100 m20.1%146–246 m

may continue beyond end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

No aerial layer here: Britain has no open or government source of aerial photography at road scale — the pan-government APGB imagery is licensed to the public sector only, unlike the LiDAR this survey is measured from. Street View, where it exists, is the visual check.

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap

Plains Lane LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Plains Lane elevation profile
Plains Lane rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

ElevationEnvironment Agency — EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)
Resolution / CRS1.0 m grid, EPSG:27700; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
TilesSE0010.tif, SE0510.tif
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract), snapshot 2026-08-12T20:21:46Z
Quality statusevidence quality B; caveated windows: structure excluded
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run chunk-06-260901, calculated 2026-09-01

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/england/bulk_dtm_1m/SE0010.tif",
    "data/cache/england/bulk_dtm_1m/SE0510.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-01T10:16:49+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/england-2026-08-12-roads.osm.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "2026-08-12T20:21:46Z",
  "run_id": "chunk-06-260901",
  "elevation_provider": "Environment Agency",
  "elevation_dataset": "EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)",
  "elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Environment Agency",
  "elevation_coverage_id": "13787b9a-26a4-4775-8523-806d13af58fc__Lidar_Composite_Elevation_DTM_1m",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "SE0010.tif",
    "SE0510.tif"
  ],
  "trimmed_from": "plains-lane",
  "trim_cut_m": [
    [
      442.4,
      607.3
    ]
  ],
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}