Discovered lane (53.2169, -3.7016)
2284.3 m · net rise 106.4 m · total ascent 160.2 m · overall 4.7% · evidence quality B (good) · Gell · Clwyd · share
Shape: sustained — 41% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 175 m.
Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the OS road network, surface models and map tags, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.
≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 20% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.
Gradient ladder what do windows mean?
| Window | Maximum | Located at | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 m (diagnostic) | ≈43% | 363–365 m | under overhead cover |
| 3 m (diagnostic) | ≈39% | 363–366 m | under overhead cover |
| 5 m | ≈34% | 346–351 m | under overhead cover |
| 10 m | ≈29% | 343–353 m | under overhead cover |
| 20 m | ≈24.8% | 346–366 m | under overhead cover |
| 25 m | ≈24.2% | 343–368 m | under overhead cover |
| 50 m | ≈19.4% | 329–379 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 19.9% at 342–392 m across a structure and terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded |
| 100 m | 16.5% | 1281–1381 m |
descends at startdescends at end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.
Map
Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap
No aerial layer here: Britain has no open or government source of aerial photography at road scale — the pan-government APGB imagery is licensed to the public sector only, unlike the LiDAR this survey is measured from. Street View, where it exists, is the visual check.
This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.
Access: Hold lifted 2026-09-18: the laser cross-section could not tell a carriageway from a cut shelf here, so Peter looked at the aerial photography and passed the road. Nothing about the measurement changes. The laser found no road bed under the line here and the best strip nearby read only 11.9 %, which made this a retirement candidate; Peter saw a single track with steep sections. Our line sits 6.9 m from the OS Open Roads centreline through the steepest 25 m, inside the 15 m the survey allows for the difference between the two maps.
Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.
Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed · Share this climb
Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%
© OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap
Profile
The profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).
Measurement card
| Elevation | Welsh Government — Welsh Government LiDAR 1m DTM (2020-2023) |
|---|---|
| Resolution / CRS | 1.0 m grid, EPSG:27700; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation |
| Tiles | wg_del_12_285369_20210307dtm.tif, wg_del_12_285370_20210307dtm.tif, wg_del_12_286369_20210307dtm.tif, wg_del_12_286370_20210307dtm.tif |
| Road centreline | OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract), snapshot 2026-08-10T20:21:40Z |
| Quality status | evidence quality B; caveated windows: canopy or structure, no bench excluded |
| Analysis | OCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run hunt-wales-260905, calculated 2026-09-04 |
Provenance
{
"analysis_version": "0.1.0",
"sample_interval_m": 1.0,
"interpolation": "bilinear",
"smoothing": "none",
"gradient_windows_m": [
5.0,
10.0,
20.0,
25.0,
50.0,
100.0
],
"diagnostic_windows_m": [
2.0,
3.0
],
"elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
"elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
"elevation_tiles": [
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_12_285369_20210307dtm.tif",
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_12_285370_20210307dtm.tif",
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_12_286369_20210307dtm.tif",
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_12_286370_20210307dtm.tif"
],
"calculated_at": "2026-09-04T22:10:07+00:00",
"road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
"road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
"osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/wales-2026-08-11.osm.pbf",
"osm_snapshot": "2026-08-10T20:21:40Z",
"run_id": "hunt-wales-260905",
"elevation_provider": "Welsh Government",
"elevation_dataset": "Welsh Government LiDAR 1m DTM (2020-2023)",
"elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Crown copyright Welsh Government",
"elevation_catalogue_layer": "geonode:welsh_government_lidar_tile_catalogue_2020_2023",
"elevation_tile_ids": [
"wg_del_12_285369_20210307dtm.tif",
"wg_del_12_285370_20210307dtm.tif",
"wg_del_12_286369_20210307dtm.tif",
"wg_del_12_286370_20210307dtm.tif"
],
"elevation_capture_dates": [
"07-03-2021"
],
"climb_origin": "discovered",
"license": "ODbL-1.0",
"license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}