LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Lane near Whitesands Bay

609.3 m · net rise 47.9 m · total ascent 52.5 m · overall 7.9% · evidence quality B (good) · Whitesands Bay · Dyfed ·

Shape: sustained — 39% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 74 m.

Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the OS road network, surface models and map tags, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈40%521–523 munder overhead cover terrain reads 64.9% at 237–239 m across a structure — excluded
3 m (diagnostic)≈31%520–523 munder overhead cover terrain reads 51.6% at 236–239 m across a structure — excluded
5 m≈25%518–523 munder overhead cover terrain reads 35.2% at 235–240 m across a structure — excluded
10 m≈17%348–358 munder overhead cover terrain reads 29.4% at 486–496 m across a structure — excluded
20 m≈13.6%462–482 munder overhead cover terrain reads 23.8% at 483–503 m across a structure — excluded
25 m≈13.4%457–482 munder overhead cover terrain reads 21.9% at 478–503 m across a structure — excluded
50 m≈12.0%432–482 munder overhead cover terrain reads 17.6% at 453–503 m across a structure — excluded
100 m≈10.2%382–482 munder overhead cover terrain reads 14.3% at 448–548 m across a structure — excluded

may start earlier Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

No aerial layer here: Britain has no open or government source of aerial photography at road scale — the pan-government APGB imagery is licensed to the public sector only, unlike the LiDAR this survey is measured from. Street View, where it exists, is the visual check.

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Access: Listed 2026-09-21 (corpus re-measure, docs/audits/remeasure-pack-260921.md): clears no ranking door at its figure; listed, not ranked (D8).

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap

Lane near Whitesands Bay LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Lane near Whitesands Bay elevation profile
Lane near Whitesands Bay rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

ElevationWelsh Government — Welsh Government LiDAR 1m DTM (2020-2023)
Resolution / CRS1.0 m grid, EPSG:27700; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
Tileswg_del_35_173227_20220127dtm.tif
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)
Quality statusevidence quality B; caveated windows: structure excluded, structure excluded min, suppression unstable, texture excluded
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run remeasure-260920-uk, calculated 2026-09-21

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "run_manifest": {
    "manifest_version": "1",
    "code_git_sha": "cd1381c557ec0196a6c481fc125290b249b285c2",
    "code_git_dirty": "true",
    "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
    "analysis_config_digest": "sha256:faa4beed0662d2f6",
    "python": "3.14.4",
    "numpy": "2.5.3",
    "rasterio": "1.5.1",
    "pyproj": "3.8.0",
    "laspy": "2.7.0",
    "shapely": "2.1.2",
    "pyosmium": "4.3.1",
    "libosmium": "2.23.1",
    "gdal": "3.12.4",
    "proj": "9.8.1",
    "run_id": "remeasure-260920-uk",
    "road_pbf": "batch-wales-chunk010.pbf",
    "region_key": "wales",
    "crs": "EPSG:27700",
    "elevation_provider_key": "wales",
    "authority": "os-open-roads",
    "registry_pbf": "wales-2026-08-11.osm.pbf"
  },
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_35_173227_20220127dtm.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-21T02:15:59+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "output/remeasure-260920/uk/batch-wales-chunk010.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "",
  "run_id": "remeasure-260920-uk",
  "elevation_provider": "Welsh Government",
  "elevation_dataset": "Welsh Government LiDAR 1m DTM (2020-2023)",
  "elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Crown copyright Welsh Government",
  "elevation_catalogue_layer": "geonode:welsh_government_lidar_tile_catalogue_2020_2023",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "wg_del_35_173227_20220127dtm.tif"
  ],
  "elevation_capture_dates": [
    "27-01-2022"
  ],
  "climb_origin": "discovered",
  "structure_own_ways": "none \u2014 the route carried no way list; own decks unmasked",
  "mask_ranges_m": [
    [
      245.0,
      289.0
    ]
  ],
  "mask_basin_extension_m": 16.0,
  "suppression_unstable": [
    5.0
  ],
  "carriageway": {
    "stations": 31,
    "stations_resolved": 31,
    "width_median_m": 2.25,
    "width_p10_m": 1.25,
    "width_min_m": 1.0,
    "width_max_m": 6.75,
    "bounded_share": 0.613,
    "unbounded_share": 0.387,
    "confidence_median": 0.601,
    "width_median_bounded_m": 2.25,
    "window_m": [
      457.0,
      482.0
    ],
    "width_at_max25_m": 2.5,
    "window_stations": 7,
    "single_track": true,
    "single_track_rule": "PROVISIONAL (2026-09-15): width_p10_m <= 3.0 m with bounded_share >= 0.6; recorded, not a rule",
    "status": "ok",
    "source": "dtm",
    "station_m": 25.0,
    "window_station_m": 5.0,
    "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
    "step_m": 0.25,
    "level_tol_m": 0.12,
    "break_min_m": 0.3,
    "stations_failed": 0,
    "hedge_to_hedge": {
      "stations": 31,
      "stations_resolved": 31,
      "width_median_m": 4.0,
      "width_p10_m": 2.5,
      "width_min_m": 2.0,
      "width_max_m": 12.0,
      "bounded_share": 0.903,
      "unbounded_share": 0.097,
      "confidence_median": 1.0,
      "width_median_bounded_m": 3.75,
      "window_m": [
        457.0,
        482.0
      ],
      "width_at_max25_m": 3.25,
      "window_stations": 7,
      "status": "ok",
      "source": "dsm",
      "station_m": 25.0,
      "window_station_m": 5.0,
      "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
      "step_m": 0.25,
      "level_tol_m": 0.5,
      "break_min_m": 0.3,
      "stations_failed": 0
    }
  },
  "remeasured": {
    "on": "2026-09-21",
    "why": "corpus re-measure 2026-09-21: a mask that exists today reaching a page published before it did; fallers only (Peter: fold the fallers)",
    "published_max25_pct": 22.08,
    "max25_pct": 13.42
  },
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}