LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Crackington Haven to Middle Crackington

1646.5 m · net rise 127.4 m · total ascent 160.3 m · overall 7.7% · evidence quality B (good) · Crackington Haven · Cornwall ·

Shape: sustained — 38% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 200 m.

Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the OS road network, surface models and map tags, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈35%380–382 munder overhead cover terrain reads 69.7% at 1312–1314 m across a structure — excluded
3 m (diagnostic)≈33%351–354 munder overhead cover terrain reads 64.0% at 1311–1314 m across a structure — excluded
5 m≈30%1416–1421 munder overhead cover terrain reads 52.9% at 1311–1316 m across a structure — excluded
10 m≈26%1416–1426 munder overhead cover terrain reads 34.6% at 230–240 m across a structure — excluded
20 m≈22.4%1406–1426 munder overhead cover terrain reads 26.4% at 220–240 m across a structure — excluded
25 m≈20.5%1407–1432 munder overhead cover terrain reads 25.5% at 228–253 m across a structure — excluded
50 m≈18.7%106–156 munder overhead cover terrain reads 21.2% at 203–253 m across a structure — excluded
100 m≈17.9%1327–1427 munder overhead cover terrain reads 18.9% at 153–253 m across a structure — excluded

may start earlier Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

No aerial layer here: Britain has no open or government source of aerial photography at road scale — the pan-government APGB imagery is licensed to the public sector only, unlike the LiDAR this survey is measured from. Street View, where it exists, is the visual check.

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap

Crackington Haven to Middle Crackington LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Crackington Haven to Middle Crackington elevation profile
Crackington Haven to Middle Crackington rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

ElevationEnvironment Agency — EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)
Resolution / CRS1.0 m grid, EPSG:27700; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
TilesE214000_N94000_2000m.tif, E214000_N96000_2000m.tif
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)
Quality statusevidence quality B; caveated windows: structure excluded, structure excluded min, texture excluded
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run remeasure-260920-uk, calculated 2026-09-21

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "run_manifest": {
    "manifest_version": "1",
    "code_git_sha": "cd1381c557ec0196a6c481fc125290b249b285c2",
    "code_git_dirty": "true",
    "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
    "analysis_config_digest": "sha256:faa4beed0662d2f6",
    "python": "3.14.4",
    "numpy": "2.5.3",
    "rasterio": "1.5.1",
    "pyproj": "3.8.0",
    "laspy": "2.7.0",
    "shapely": "2.1.2",
    "pyosmium": "4.3.1",
    "libosmium": "2.23.1",
    "gdal": "3.12.4",
    "proj": "9.8.1",
    "run_id": "remeasure-260920-uk",
    "road_pbf": "batch-england-chunk042.pbf",
    "region_key": "england",
    "crs": "EPSG:27700",
    "elevation_provider_key": "england",
    "authority": "os-open-roads",
    "registry_pbf": "england-2026-08-27.osm.pbf"
  },
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/england/dtm_1m/E214000_N94000_2000m.tif",
    "data/cache/england/dtm_1m/E214000_N96000_2000m.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-21T02:11:35+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "output/remeasure-260920/uk/batch-england-chunk042.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "",
  "run_id": "remeasure-260920-uk",
  "elevation_provider": "Environment Agency",
  "elevation_dataset": "EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)",
  "elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Environment Agency",
  "elevation_coverage_id": "13787b9a-26a4-4775-8523-806d13af58fc__Lidar_Composite_Elevation_DTM_1m",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "E214000_N94000_2000m.tif",
    "E214000_N96000_2000m.tif"
  ],
  "climb_origin": "discovered",
  "structure_own_ways": "none \u2014 the route carried no way list; own decks unmasked",
  "carriageway": {
    "stations": 72,
    "stations_resolved": 72,
    "width_median_m": 4.75,
    "width_p10_m": 2.75,
    "width_min_m": 1.5,
    "width_max_m": 11.5,
    "bounded_share": 0.278,
    "unbounded_share": 0.722,
    "confidence_median": 0.0,
    "width_median_bounded_m": 4.0,
    "window_m": [
      1407.0,
      1432.0
    ],
    "width_at_max25_m": 4.75,
    "window_stations": 7,
    "single_track": false,
    "single_track_rule": "PROVISIONAL (2026-09-15): width_p10_m <= 3.0 m with bounded_share >= 0.6; recorded, not a rule",
    "status": "ok",
    "source": "dtm",
    "station_m": 25.0,
    "window_station_m": 5.0,
    "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
    "step_m": 0.25,
    "level_tol_m": 0.12,
    "break_min_m": 0.3,
    "stations_failed": 0,
    "hedge_to_hedge": {
      "stations": 72,
      "stations_resolved": 72,
      "width_median_m": 5.0,
      "width_p10_m": 3.05,
      "width_min_m": 1.5,
      "width_max_m": 10.75,
      "bounded_share": 0.917,
      "unbounded_share": 0.083,
      "confidence_median": 1.0,
      "width_median_bounded_m": 5.0,
      "window_m": [
        1407.0,
        1432.0
      ],
      "width_at_max25_m": 5.5,
      "window_stations": 7,
      "status": "ok",
      "source": "dsm",
      "station_m": 25.0,
      "window_station_m": 5.0,
      "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
      "step_m": 0.25,
      "level_tol_m": 0.5,
      "break_min_m": 0.3,
      "stations_failed": 0
    }
  },
  "unmapped_bridge_span": {
    "start_m": 1220.0,
    "end_m": 1392.0,
    "span_m": 172.0,
    "floor_at_m": 1310.0,
    "depth_m": 17.4,
    "drop_m": 14.8,
    "surface": "raw",
    "window_start_m": 1407.0,
    "window_end_m": 1432.0,
    "gap_m": 15.0,
    "unstable": false,
    "perturbation_hits": 3,
    "note": "The ground falls 15 m below the road between 1220 m and 1392 m \u2014 17 m below the straight line joining the profile either side of it \u2014 and climbs back to that line, with the steepest 25 m at 1407 m. That is a ravine under a deck OSM does not tag as a bridge, so no mask fired. Re-measure with mask_ranges_m over the span before this maximum stands (unmapped-bridge-span, Peter 2026-09-20)."
  },
  "remeasured": {
    "on": "2026-09-21",
    "why": "corpus re-measure 2026-09-21: a mask that exists today reaching a page published before it did; fallers only (Peter: fold the fallers)",
    "published_max25_pct": 24.42,
    "max25_pct": 20.5
  },
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}