LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Route de Morenci

2631.3 m · net rise 296.6 m · total ascent 307.0 m · overall 11.3% · evidence quality B (good) · Bénaix · Ariège ·

Shape: sustained — 31% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 349 m.

Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against IGN’s BD TOPO® road network, OpenStreetMap and the classified LiDAR HD point cloud, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.

≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 66% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈40%1592–1594 munder overhead cover terrain reads 55.2% at 2260–2262 m across a structure and terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded
3 m (diagnostic)≈37%1591–1594 munder overhead cover terrain reads 50.4% at 2260–2263 m across a structure and terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded
5 m≈33%1590–1595 munder overhead cover terrain reads 46.0% at 921–926 m across a structure and terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded
10 m≈25%1589–1599 munder overhead cover terrain reads 33.2% at 917–927 m across a structure and terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded
20 m≈19.3%1189–1209 munder overhead cover terrain reads 22.7% at 2244–2264 m across a structure and terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded
25 m≈18.5%2057–2082 munder overhead cover terrain reads 20.3% at 2239–2264 m across a structure and terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded
50 m≈16.9%2057–2107 munder overhead cover terrain reads 17.0% at 2247–2297 m across a structure — excluded
100 m≈15.8%2057–2157 munder overhead cover terrain reads 15.9% at 2248–2348 m across a structure — excluded

may start earliermay continue beyond end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Surface: paved throughout, according to BD TOPO®, IGN's national topographic database.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap · aerial imagery © IGN, BD ORTHO® (Licence Ouverte Etalab 2.0)

Route de Morenci LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The map, profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Route de Morenci elevation profile
Route de Morenci rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

ElevationIGN LiDAR HD MNT 0.5 m — LiDAR HD — MNT (sol) et MNS (surface), 0,50 m (Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière), RGF93 / Lambert-93 EPSG:2154, altitudes IGN69
Resolution / CRS0.5 m grid, EPSG:2154; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
TilesE605-N6200, E605-N6201, E606-N6199, E606-N6200, E606-N6201
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)
Quality statusevidence quality B; caveated windows: canopy or structure, no bench excluded, structure excluded, texture excluded
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run fr-pyr3, calculated 2026-09-20

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "run_manifest": {
    "manifest_version": "1",
    "code_git_sha": "06fa4c370391597f015858e97dcf01ca2f5b3640",
    "code_git_dirty": "false",
    "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
    "analysis_config_digest": "sha256:0048c2bbb24ab95e",
    "python": "3.14.4",
    "numpy": "2.5.3",
    "rasterio": "1.5.1",
    "pyproj": "3.8.0",
    "laspy": "2.7.0",
    "shapely": "2.1.2",
    "pyosmium": "4.3.1",
    "libosmium": "2.23.1",
    "gdal": "3.12.4",
    "proj": "9.8.1",
    "run_id": "fr-pyr3",
    "road_pbf": "block-batch-fr-pyr3.osm.pbf",
    "region_key": "france",
    "crs": "EPSG:2154",
    "elevation_provider_key": "ign-lidarhd",
    "tile_index": "wms-grid",
    "authority": "bdtopo",
    "registry_pbf": "france-vosges-2026-09-16.osm.pbf",
    "tile_index_snapshot": "sha256:79dd257545ed11dc"
  },
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:2154",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 0.5,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/fr/ign-lidarhd_dtm_E605-N6200_0m5@21LHD3JR2-2025-04-11.tif",
    "data/cache/fr/ign-lidarhd_dtm_E605-N6201_0m5@21LHD3JR2-2025-04-11.tif",
    "data/cache/fr/ign-lidarhd_dtm_E606-N6199_0m5@21LHD3JR2-2025-04-11.tif",
    "data/cache/fr/ign-lidarhd_dtm_E606-N6200_0m5@21LHD3JR2-2025-04-11.tif",
    "data/cache/fr/ign-lidarhd_dtm_E606-N6201_0m5@21LHD3JR2-2025-04-11.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-20T07:15:35+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/block-batch-fr-pyr3.osm.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "",
  "run_id": "fr-pyr3",
  "elevation_provider": "IGN LiDAR HD MNT 0.5 m",
  "elevation_licence": "Licence Ouverte / Open Licence 2.0 (Etalab) \u2014 \u00a9 IGN, LiDAR HD (MNT/MNS), data.geopf.fr; reproduction autoris\u00e9e avec mention de la source et de la date",
  "elevation_dataset": "LiDAR HD \u2014 MNT (sol) et MNS (surface), 0,50 m (Institut national de l'information g\u00e9ographique et foresti\u00e8re), RGF93 / Lambert-93 EPSG:2154, altitudes IGN69",
  "elevation_vertical_datum": "IGN69",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "E605-N6200",
    "E605-N6201",
    "E606-N6199",
    "E606-N6200",
    "E606-N6201"
  ],
  "elevation_blocks": [
    "21LHD3JR2@2025-04-11"
  ],
  "ign_dalles": [
    "LHD_FXX_0605_6201_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69",
    "LHD_FXX_0605_6202_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69",
    "LHD_FXX_0606_6200_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69",
    "LHD_FXX_0606_6201_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69",
    "LHD_FXX_0606_6202_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69"
  ],
  "ign_missions": [
    "21LHD3JR2"
  ],
  "ign_editions": [
    "2025-04-11"
  ],
  "ign_dsm_edition": {
    "LHD_FXX_0605_6201_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69": "2025-04-11",
    "LHD_FXX_0605_6202_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69": "2025-04-11",
    "LHD_FXX_0606_6200_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69": "2025-04-11",
    "LHD_FXX_0606_6201_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69": "2025-04-11",
    "LHD_FXX_0606_6202_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69": "2025-04-11"
  },
  "climb_origin": "discovered",
  "structure_own_ways": 1,
  "carriageway": {
    "stations": 112,
    "stations_resolved": 112,
    "width_median_m": 5.25,
    "width_p10_m": 2.53,
    "width_min_m": 1.0,
    "width_max_m": 12.0,
    "bounded_share": 0.205,
    "unbounded_share": 0.795,
    "confidence_median": 0.0,
    "width_median_bounded_m": 4.5,
    "window_m": [
      2057.0,
      2082.0
    ],
    "width_at_max25_m": 5.25,
    "window_stations": 7,
    "single_track": false,
    "single_track_rule": "PROVISIONAL (2026-09-15): width_p10_m <= 3.0 m with bounded_share >= 0.6; recorded, not a rule",
    "status": "ok",
    "source": "dtm",
    "station_m": 25.0,
    "window_station_m": 5.0,
    "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
    "step_m": 0.25,
    "level_tol_m": 0.12,
    "break_min_m": 0.3,
    "stations_failed": 0,
    "hedge_to_hedge": {
      "stations": 112,
      "stations_resolved": 112,
      "width_median_m": 2.5,
      "width_p10_m": 1.0,
      "width_min_m": 0.0,
      "width_max_m": 12.0,
      "bounded_share": 0.839,
      "unbounded_share": 0.161,
      "confidence_median": 1.0,
      "width_median_bounded_m": 2.0,
      "window_m": [
        2057.0,
        2082.0
      ],
      "width_at_max25_m": 2.0,
      "window_stations": 7,
      "status": "ok",
      "source": "dsm",
      "station_m": 25.0,
      "window_station_m": 5.0,
      "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
      "step_m": 0.25,
      "level_tol_m": 0.5,
      "break_min_m": 0.3,
      "stations_failed": 0
    }
  },
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}