LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Col des Quatre Chemins from La Villedieu

1723.8 m · net rise 65.1 m · overall 3.8% · evidence quality B (good) · Monts-de-Randon · Lozère ·

Shape: sustained — 27% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance.

Not yet matched against documented climbs — the measurement stands on its own.

≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 9% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈8%968–970 munder overhead cover
3 m (diagnostic)≈6%973–976 munder overhead cover
5 m≈6%1112–1117 munder overhead cover
10 m≈5%968–978 munder overhead cover
20 m4.9%156–176 m
25 m4.8%589–614 m
50 m4.6%507–557 m
100 m4.4%515–615 m

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Surface: paved throughout, according to BD TOPO®, IGN's national topographic database.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap · aerial imagery © IGN, BD ORTHO® (Licence Ouverte Etalab 2.0)

Col des Quatre Chemins from La Villedieu LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The map, profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Col des Quatre Chemins from La Villedieu elevation profile
Col des Quatre Chemins from La Villedieu rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

ElevationIGN LiDAR HD MNT 0.5 m — LiDAR HD — MNT (sol) et MNS (surface), 0,50 m (Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière), RGF93 / Lambert-93 EPSG:2154, altitudes IGN69
Resolution / CRS0.5 m grid, EPSG:2154; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
TilesE739-N6398, E739-N6399
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)
Quality statusevidence quality B; caveated windows: canopy or structure
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run fr-mc5, calculated 2026-09-22

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "run_manifest": {
    "manifest_version": "1",
    "code_git_sha": "1cc9fdcd6556a02163cb21acb2293cad3067d2a1",
    "code_git_dirty": "false",
    "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
    "analysis_config_digest": "sha256:8c94015b54267da4",
    "python": "3.14.4",
    "numpy": "2.5.3",
    "rasterio": "1.5.1",
    "pyproj": "3.8.0",
    "laspy": "2.7.0",
    "shapely": "2.1.2",
    "pyosmium": "4.3.1",
    "libosmium": "2.23.1",
    "gdal": "3.12.4",
    "proj": "9.8.1",
    "run_id": "fr-mc5",
    "road_pbf": "block-batch-fr-mc5.osm.pbf",
    "region_key": "france",
    "crs": "EPSG:2154",
    "elevation_provider_key": "ign-lidarhd",
    "tile_index": "wms-grid",
    "authority": "bdtopo",
    "registry_pbf": "france-vosges-2026-09-16.osm.pbf",
    "tile_index_snapshot": "sha256:af4eae1f5df9e232"
  },
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:2154",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 0.5,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/fr/ign-lidarhd_dtm_E739-N6398_0m5@21LHD4MN-2024-12-13.tif",
    "data/cache/fr/ign-lidarhd_dtm_E739-N6399_0m5@21LHD4MN-2024-12-13.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-22T16:23:12+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/block-batch-fr-mc5.osm.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "",
  "run_id": "fr-mc5",
  "elevation_provider": "IGN LiDAR HD MNT 0.5 m",
  "elevation_licence": "Licence Ouverte / Open Licence 2.0 (Etalab) \u2014 \u00a9 IGN, LiDAR HD (MNT/MNS), data.geopf.fr; reproduction autoris\u00e9e avec mention de la source et de la date",
  "elevation_dataset": "LiDAR HD \u2014 MNT (sol) et MNS (surface), 0,50 m (Institut national de l'information g\u00e9ographique et foresti\u00e8re), RGF93 / Lambert-93 EPSG:2154, altitudes IGN69",
  "elevation_vertical_datum": "IGN69",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "E739-N6398",
    "E739-N6399"
  ],
  "elevation_blocks": [
    "21LHD4MN@2024-12-13"
  ],
  "ign_dalles": [
    "LHD_FXX_0739_6399_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69",
    "LHD_FXX_0739_6400_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69"
  ],
  "ign_missions": [
    "21LHD4MN"
  ],
  "ign_editions": [
    "2024-12-13"
  ],
  "ign_dsm_edition": {
    "LHD_FXX_0739_6399_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69": "2024-12-13",
    "LHD_FXX_0739_6400_MNT_O_0M50_LAMB93_IGN69": "2024-12-13"
  },
  "climb_origin": "named-pass",
  "structure_own_ways": 1,
  "carriageway": {
    "stations": 75,
    "stations_resolved": 75,
    "width_median_m": 6.25,
    "width_p10_m": 4.5,
    "width_min_m": 4.0,
    "width_max_m": 10.25,
    "bounded_share": 0.547,
    "unbounded_share": 0.453,
    "confidence_median": 0.568,
    "width_median_bounded_m": 6.5,
    "window_m": [
      589.0,
      614.0
    ],
    "width_at_max25_m": 6.25,
    "window_stations": 7,
    "single_track": false,
    "single_track_rule": "PROVISIONAL (2026-09-15): width_p10_m <= 3.0 m with bounded_share >= 0.6; recorded, not a rule",
    "status": "ok",
    "source": "dtm",
    "station_m": 25.0,
    "window_station_m": 5.0,
    "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
    "step_m": 0.25,
    "level_tol_m": 0.12,
    "break_min_m": 0.3,
    "stations_failed": 0,
    "hedge_to_hedge": {
      "stations": 75,
      "stations_resolved": 75,
      "width_median_m": 6.75,
      "width_p10_m": 1.1,
      "width_min_m": 0.5,
      "width_max_m": 10.75,
      "bounded_share": 0.787,
      "unbounded_share": 0.213,
      "confidence_median": 1.0,
      "width_median_bounded_m": 5.75,
      "window_m": [
        589.0,
        614.0
      ],
      "width_at_max25_m": 4.0,
      "window_stations": 7,
      "status": "ok",
      "source": "dsm",
      "station_m": 25.0,
      "window_station_m": 5.0,
      "halfwidth_m": 6.0,
      "step_m": 0.25,
      "level_tol_m": 0.5,
      "break_min_m": 0.3,
      "stations_failed": 0
    }
  },
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}