LIVING SURVEY — measurements are reviewed continuously as new data and local evidence arrive. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Chemin du Grandina

679.6 m · net rise 85.7 m · total ascent 112.0 m · overall 12.6% · evidence quality B (good) · Sion · Valais/Wallis ·

Shape: sustained — 36% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 159 m.

Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against swisstopo’s swissTLM3D road model, OpenStreetMap and a second terrain model, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)≈31%503–505 munder overhead cover terrain reads 208.6% at 248–250 m across a structure — excluded
3 m (diagnostic)≈25%224–227 munder overhead cover terrain reads 144.9% at 247–250 m across a structure — excluded
5 m≈23%361–366 munder overhead cover terrain reads 94.0% at 247–252 m across a structure — excluded
10 m≈19%216–226 munder overhead cover terrain reads 54.5% at 247–257 m across a structure — excluded
20 m≈18.6%211–231 munder overhead cover terrain reads 38.5% at 319–339 m across a structure — excluded
25 m≈15.6%268–293 munder overhead cover terrain reads 35.5% at 319–344 m across a structure — excluded
50 m≈14.0%595–645 munder overhead cover terrain reads 29.4% at 319–369 m across a structure and ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded
100 m≈13.5%548–648 munder overhead cover terrain reads 22.5% at 248–348 m across a structure — excluded

may continue beyond end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Surface: paved throughout, according to swisstopo's swissTLM3D road model.

Access: Listed 2026-09-11 (texture re-measure): with the step masked the steepest 25 m reads 15.6 %, below the ranking door — kept as a listed page.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

Route colour = gradient over a 25 m window: <10% 10–20% 20–25% ≥25%

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap · aerial imagery © swisstopo

Chemin du Grandina LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

The map, profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m. Any 25 m figure is good to about a point either way (why).

Chemin du Grandina elevation profile
Chemin du Grandina rolling gradient profile
 

Measurement card

Elevationswisstopo swissALTI3D — swissALTI3D 0.5 m DTM (Federal Office of Topography swisstopo)
Resolution / CRS0.5 m grid, EPSG:2056; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation
Tiles2596-1121, 2596-1122
Road centrelineOpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)
Quality statusevidence quality B; caveated windows: placement excluded, structure excluded, texture excluded
AnalysisOCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run texture-ch-ch-260912, calculated 2026-09-12

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:2056",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 0.5,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/ch/swissalti3d_2024_2596-1121_0.5_2056_5728.tif",
    "data/cache/ch/swissalti3d_2024_2596-1122_0.5_2056_5728.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-09-12T01:29:16+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "output/texture-ch-ch/batch-switzerland-rchunk01.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "",
  "run_id": "texture-ch-ch-260912",
  "elevation_provider": "swisstopo swissALTI3D",
  "elevation_licence": "swisstopo open government data (OGD): free use, attribution '\u00a9 swisstopo' \u2014 https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/terms-and-conditions",
  "elevation_dataset": "swissALTI3D 0.5 m DTM (Federal Office of Topography swisstopo)",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "2596-1121",
    "2596-1122"
  ],
  "climb_origin": "discovered",
  "canopy_check": "unavailable \u2014 no surface model (DSM or point cloud) registered for this coverage",
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing"
}