BETA — measurements and names under active refinement. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Roman Way

565.6 m · net rise 21.6 m · total ascent 27.2 m · overall 3.8% · confidence: high · Caerllion · Gwent ·

Shape: sustained — 44% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 34 m.

Documented on the ground — tag: 30% (2021). Signs get repainted and tags get retagged, so the date is part of the fact; not yet matched against any cycling list.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)15%509–511 m
3 m (diagnostic)14%504–507 m
5 m14%505–510 m
10 m13%502–512 m
20 m12.5%496–516 m
25 m12.1%491–516 m
50 m10.3%476–526 m
100 m9.0%428–528 m

may_continue_beyond_end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed ·

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap

Roman Way LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

Roman Way elevation profile Roman Way rolling gradient profile

Reported values vs. measurement

SourceClaimEvidenceBest-matching window
OSM incline tag (bulk changeset)30%mapper_estimate2 m (+14.9 pp)

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_5_333191_20201201dtm.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-08-12T09:11:52+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/wales-2026-08-11.osm.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "2026-08-10T20:21:40Z",
  "elevation_provider": "Welsh Government",
  "elevation_dataset": "Welsh Government LiDAR 1m DTM (2020-2023)",
  "elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Crown copyright Welsh Government",
  "elevation_catalogue_layer": "geonode:welsh_government_lidar_tile_catalogue_2020_2023",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "wg_del_5_333191_20201201dtm.tif"
  ],
  "elevation_capture_dates": [
    "01-12-2020"
  ],
  "climb_origin": "osm_incline",
  "notes": "Measured max 5 m 13.9%. The 15%\u219230% self-revision by the same mapper shows these are impressions, not sign readings. EXTENDED by graph walk: +0 segment(s) at base, +1 at top (stop: base=no_descending_continuation, top=no_ascending_continuation; min_avg=2.0%). Review before adopting.",
  "license": "ODbL-1.0",
  "license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing.html"
}