BETA — measurements and names under active refinement. Seen a sign, a gate, or a better name? Submit an update no account needed · photos welcome via GitHub

← all climbs

Cot Valley to Kelynack°

868.3 m · net rise 41.7 m · total ascent 70.1 m · overall 4.8% · confidence: needs confirmation · St Just · Cornwall

Shape: sustained — 42% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 75 m.

Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the OS road network, surface models and map tags, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.

° The name is provisional: this climb is not yet matched to a documented name, so it was named from nearby map places. There is no evidence of local usage — (auto-named from gazetteer (hypothesis, unreviewed); discovered as 'Discovered lane (50.1146, -5.6855)'). Corrections welcome.

needs review short_window_divergence — treat short-window maxima here as provisional.

≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 12% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.

Gradient ladder what do windows mean?

WindowMaximumLocated at
2 m (diagnostic)53%451–453 munder overhead cover terrain reads 72.5% at 39–41 m across a structure — excluded
3 m (diagnostic)46%112–115 munder overhead cover terrain reads 64.0% at 39–42 m across a structure — excluded
5 m38%111–116 munder overhead cover terrain reads 51.8% at 36–41 m across a structure — excluded
10 m26%154–164 munder overhead cover terrain reads 38.5% at 35–45 m across a structure — excluded
20 m23.4%150–170 munder overhead cover terrain reads 26.7% at 35–55 m across a structure — excluded
25 m21.6%146–171 munder overhead cover terrain reads 24.8% at 35–60 m across a structure — excluded
50 m16.4%66–116 munder overhead cover terrain reads 20.7% at 35–85 m across a structure — excluded
100 m12.5%70–170 munder overhead cover terrain reads 15.3% at 31–131 m across a structure — excluded

Map

Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap

This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.

Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed

  © OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap

Cot Valley to Kelynack LiDAR hillshade map with contours

Profile

Cot Valley to Kelynack elevation profile Cot Valley to Kelynack rolling gradient profile

Provenance

{
  "analysis_version": "0.1.0",
  "sample_interval_m": 1.0,
  "interpolation": "bilinear",
  "smoothing": "none",
  "gradient_windows_m": [
    5.0,
    10.0,
    20.0,
    25.0,
    50.0,
    100.0
  ],
  "diagnostic_windows_m": [
    2.0,
    3.0
  ],
  "elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
  "elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
  "elevation_tiles": [
    "data/cache/england/bulk_dtm_1m/SW3525.tif",
    "data/cache/england/bulk_dtm_1m/SW3530.tif"
  ],
  "calculated_at": "2026-08-19T18:06:40+00:00",
  "road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
  "road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
  "osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/england-2026-08-12.osm.pbf",
  "osm_snapshot": "2026-08-12T20:21:46Z",
  "elevation_provider": "Environment Agency",
  "elevation_dataset": "EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)",
  "elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Environment Agency",
  "elevation_coverage_id": "13787b9a-26a4-4775-8523-806d13af58fc__Lidar_Composite_Elevation_DTM_1m",
  "elevation_tile_ids": [
    "SW3525.tif",
    "SW3530.tif"
  ],
  "climb_origin": "discovered",
  "notes": "Coarse pass: max 9.6% over 200 m (Terrain 50), gain 34.5 m over 816 m way. EXTENDED by graph walk: +0 segment(s) at base, +1 at top (stop: base=no_descending_continuation, top=no_ascending_continuation; min_avg=2.0%). Review before adopting. ADOPTED (England launch slice 2026-08-16): clean-steep. AUTO-NAMED from gazetteer (hypothesis, unreviewed): was 'Discovered lane (50.1146, -5.6855)'.",
  "naming_note": "auto-named from gazetteer (hypothesis, unreviewed); discovered as 'Discovered lane (50.1146, -5.6855)'"
}