Buzzacott Lane
2803.9 m · net rise 225.9 m · total ascent 235.7 m · overall 8.1% · confidence: good · Combe Martin · Devon
Shape: stepped — 49% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 255 m.
Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the OS road network, surface models and map tags, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.
≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 9% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.
Gradient ladder what do windows mean?
| Window | Maximum | Located at | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 m (diagnostic) | ≈54% | 1680–1682 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 67.8% at 1649–1651 m across a structure — excluded |
| 3 m (diagnostic) | ≈49% | 1679–1682 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 64.2% at 1649–1652 m across a structure — excluded |
| 5 m | ≈35% | 1679–1684 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 50.0% at 1648–1653 m across a structure — excluded |
| 10 m | ≈30% | 1633–1643 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 37.0% at 1642–1652 m across a structure — excluded |
| 20 m | ≈27.6% | 1626–1646 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 33.0% at 1633–1653 m across a structure — excluded |
| 25 m | ≈26.1% | 1621–1646 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 31.3% at 1628–1653 m across a structure — excluded |
| 50 m | ≈23.1% | 1596–1646 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 25.8% at 1603–1653 m across a structure — excluded |
| 100 m | ≈21.0% | 1546–1646 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 22.8% at 1582–1682 m across a structure — excluded |
Map
Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap
This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.
Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed
© OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap
Profile
Provenance
{
"analysis_version": "0.1.0",
"sample_interval_m": 1.0,
"interpolation": "bilinear",
"smoothing": "none",
"gradient_windows_m": [
5.0,
10.0,
20.0,
25.0,
50.0,
100.0
],
"diagnostic_windows_m": [
2.0,
3.0
],
"elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
"elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
"elevation_tiles": [
"data/cache/england/bulk_dtm_1m/SS5545.tif",
"data/cache/england/bulk_dtm_1m/SS6045.tif"
],
"calculated_at": "2026-08-15T04:19:05+00:00",
"road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
"road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
"osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/england-2026-08-12-roads.osm.pbf",
"osm_snapshot": "2026-08-12T20:21:46Z",
"elevation_provider": "Environment Agency",
"elevation_dataset": "EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)",
"elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Environment Agency",
"elevation_coverage_id": "13787b9a-26a4-4775-8523-806d13af58fc__Lidar_Composite_Elevation_DTM_1m",
"elevation_tile_ids": [
"SS5545.tif",
"SS6045.tif"
],
"climb_origin": "discovered",
"notes": "Coarse pass: max 10.1% over 200 m (Terrain 50), gain 58.0 m over 1305 m way. EXTENDED by graph walk: +2 segment(s) at base, +5 at top (stop: base=no_descending_continuation, top=no_ascending_continuation; min_avg=2.0%). Review before adopting. DEDUPE: absorbed 1 overlapping proposal(s): nutcombe-hill"
}